ArticleScientific reports2026
X-THREAT framework for adaptive and explainable deep learning-based minority-class and zero-day cyber threat detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dynamic nature of cyber threats-particularly minority-class and zero-day attacks-poses significant challenges to existing intrusion detection systems (IDS), which often lack adaptability, interpretability, and robustness. This paper presents X-THREAT, an adaptive and explainable deep learning framework designed to improve detection of rare and previously unseen cyber threats. Unlike prior approaches that treat detection, augmentation, and explainability separately, X-THREAT integrates these components within a unified pipeline. A hybrid VAE-GAN module enhances minority-class representation during training, while a CNN-BiLSTM-attention model performs threat detection, and a context-aware SHAP mechanism provides interpretable insights into model decisions. Experimental results on three benchmark datasets-CICIDS2017, UNSW-NB15, and ToN-IoT-show that X-THREAT consistently outperforms representative deep learning baselines. The model achieves 96.3% accuracy and 95.5% F1-score on CICIDS2017, 94.1% accuracy and 92.5% F1-score on UNSW-NB15, and 93.2% accuracy and 91.5% F1-score on ToN-IoT, along with improved minority-class recall and reduced false positive rates. AUC-ROC values of 0.97, 0.95, and 0.94 further demonstrate strong discriminative capability. Zero-day detection capability is evaluated using a leave-one-attack-class-out protocol, and interpretability is assessed through fidelity analysis and comparison with static SHAP and LIME methods. Results indicate consistent performance across independently evaluated datasets, suggesting potential for generalization. From a deployment perspective, computationally intensive components are restricted to offline training, while inference relies on the detection model with optional explanation. However, latency, resource usage, and edge deployment feasibility were not explicitly benchmarked and remain important directions for future work. Overall, X-THREAT provides a robust and interpretable framework for modern intrusion detection, with improved performance on minority-class and zero-day threat scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.