Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42744839›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The impact of adding orange peel waste on the engineering proprieties of fired clay bricks.

M M Ahmed, Ahmed M Ebid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M M AhmedDepartment of Physics and Mathematics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Mataria, Capital University (formally Helwan University), Cairo, 11718, Egypt.
Ahmed M EbidStructural Engineering & Construction Management Department, Future University in Egypt, Cairo, 11835, Egypt. ahmed.abdelkhaleq@fue.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3392-4424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construction industry urgently requires sustainable alternatives to conventional building materials to reduce resource depletion and greenhouse gas emissions. This study systematically investigates the incorporation of orange peel waste (OPW) as an eco-friendly pore-forming agent in fired clay bricks. Brick formulations were prepared by replacing clay with OPW at dosages of 0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0%, and sintered at peak firing temperatures of 700 °C, 800 °C, and 900 °C. The physical, mechanical, and thermal properties were rigorously evaluated. The results demonstrate that increasing OPW content leads to a progressive reduction in bulk density alongside an increase in apparent porosity and water absorption due to organic matter combustion. Although the induced macro-pores decreased compressive strength, specimens containing 5.0-10% OPW fired at 900 °C safely exceeded international regulatory thresholds for non-load-bearing structural applications. Furthermore, the optimized bricks exhibited a substantial drop in thermal conductivity (down to 0.42 W/m K at 10% (OPW). Ultimately, a 5.0-10% OPW incorporation fired at 900 °C offers an optimal balance between structural integrity and enhanced insulation.

Indexed as

Agro-waste valorizationFired clay bricksOrange peel wastePore-forming agentSustainable construction materialsThermal conductivity

Identifiers

PMID42744839
PMCPMC13578278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.