ArticleScientific reports2026
HED-ID: a federated expert system for interpretable and resource-adaptive intrusion detection on edge devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of edge computing in industrial and IoT networks necessitates expert systems that support accurate, interpretable, and resource-efficient intrusion detection under strict privacy and computational constraints. This paper presents HED-ID, a fully integrated federated expert system designed for real-time, edge-oriented anomaly detection. The system combines: (i) a stacked bidirectional GRU (BiGRU) architecture with hybrid temporal-spatial attention for sequential and feature-level anomaly modeling, (ii) a resource-adaptive Grey Wolf Optimizer (A-GWO) that modulates exploration-exploitation behavior based on real-time CPU utilization and Bayesian epistemic uncertainty, with formal convergence proof under bounded resource shifts (Appendix A), (iii) federated SHAP, which aggregates local explanations using weighted averaging to produce consistent global attributions without sharing raw data, (iv) a multi-objective fitness function that simultaneously considers accuracy, model complexity, and predictive uncertainty, and (v) SHAP-guided iterative pruning for reducing computational overhead while preserving model fidelity. Empirical evaluation on CICIDS-2017, UNSW-NB15, ToN-IoT, and a noisy-edge variant of ToN-IoT (10-20% controlled packet loss and jitter) demonstrates 95.6% accuracy in cloud-like conditions and 93.8% on Raspberry Pi 4 (4 GB RAM) before pruning, with inference latency maintained within 18-22 ms. Post-pruning, memory usage decreases from 92 to 115 MB to 78-96 MB, with ≤ 1.1% accuracy degradation. To support deployment, Docker orchestration templates, pruning threshold configurations, and Grafana-based monitoring are provided-reducing retraining interventions from 11 to 4 per year in a simulated 50-device edge environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.