ArticleNature communications2026
Global genomic surveillance uncovers emergence and spatiotemporal patterns of World Health Organization priority antibiotic resistance in invasive Salmonella.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neglected ESKAPE Pathogens in Companion Animals: Diagnostic Bias, Zoonotic Blind Spots, and Phytotherapeutic Opportunities.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Global Genomic Analysis Reveals Spatial Patterns and Temporal Trends of Priority-Antimicrobial Resistance inVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in invasive Salmonella infections remains a global public health concern, and enhanced high-quality genomic surveillance is essential to inform guidelines and policies. Here, we aimed to describe clinically key antibiotic resistance trends in invasive Salmonella infections using 7691 isolates derived from national surveillance and publicly available datasets between 1954 and 2024. 29 (37.7%) of 77 countries identified at least one isolate with resistance or decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, 25 (32.5%) and 29 (37.7%) countries resistance or decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone and cefixime, 8 (10.4%) countries resistance to azithromycin, 15 (19.5%) countries resistance to fosfomycin, 10 (13.0%) countries resistance to colistin. Overall, 7.39% of 7691 isolates were resistant or decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, 7.91% reported resistance or decreased susceptibility to 3GCs, 4.23% reported resistance to fosfomycin, and 0.79% reported resistance to azithromycin. Globally, azithromycin resistance is increasing, as is resistance or decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, 3GCs, and 4GCs. However, surveillance levels remain inadequate in African and South American regions. We generated a global map of clinically key antibiotic resistance genes in invasive Salmonella infections worldwide. This retrospective, global, longitudinal genomic epidemiology study on invasive Salmonella provides evidence-based data for clinical guidelines, genomic surveillance, AMR control, and public health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.