ArticleNature communications2026
Deciphering the evolutionary origin of the enantioselectivity of short-chain dehydrogenases from plants toward 1-borneol.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enzyme engineering has produced numerous methods to optimize enzymes for biotechnological processes; however, less is known about how natural evolution creates new functionalities. We investigate the evolutionary emergence of enantioselectivity in plant borneol dehydrogenases, which feature hydrophobic active-sites and are enantioselective towards dibornane-type monoterpenols. Ancestral sequence reconstruction provided a trajectory from the oldest unselective ancestor N30 (E = 12) toward a more recent selective ancestor N32, involving 19 mutations: 18 mutations are peripheral, one (I111L) occurs in the active-site. The mutation L111I in the hydrophobic pocket increased the selectivity of N30, while the back-mutation I111L decreased the selectivity of N32. Additional peripheral mutations (V136L/G169A/V183I) were required for high selectivity. Crystal structures suggested that protein dynamics rather than structural changes shape these catalytic properties; this was confirmed by Machine Learning/Molecular Mechanics simulations of ligand binding. Funnel-metadynamics simulations revealed a correlation between the active-site's solvent-accessible surface area and selectivity. This potential evolutionary pathway shapes enantioselectivity, and guides future enzyme engineering campaigns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.