ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2026
Communication, everyday life and technology from the perspectives of children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions who are eligible for paediatric palliative care often have complex care needs. However, they prefer to live as normally as possible, which necessitates coordinated and multidisciplinary support that allows them to be at home rather than in a hospital. Advancements in technology have the potential to support home-based care, yet little is known about children's own communication needs, their views on home-based care and the possibilities of technology to support communication. Previous research has primarily focused on the views of parents and healthcare professionals. Consequently, this study aimed to explore what children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions find important in communication with healthcare professionals and others and the role of technology in daily life.
methodsThis qualitative study employed an exploratory design and used individual semi-structured interviews with children eligible for paediatric palliative care. Seven children aged 8-15 years with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions participated. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree themes were developed: (1) understanding technology through daily life rather than in the frame of healthcare, (2) technology has the potential to be a digital bridge to normalcy and social belonging and (3) seeking information and safety through in-person meetings.
conclusionChildren with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions place a high value on in-person communication with healthcare professionals, emphasising the need for safety, predictability and clear information, particularly when medical procedures are involved. The findings highlight gaps in children's involvement in decision-making and underscore the importance of including children's perspectives when developing communication strategies and technologies to support home-based paediatric palliative care. These children primarily associated technology with gaming and everyday social interactions. They had little experience with technology in their healthcare follow-up and were unfamiliar with possibilities for use in the context of communication with healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.