Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42744411›Full record

ArticleEcology2026

Accounting for variable detection functions in temporal abundance modeling via transfer learning.

Kevin M Collins, Erin M Schliep, Tyler Wagner, Christopher K Wikle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin M CollinsDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0131-6097
Erin M SchliepDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Tyler WagnerDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-016X
Christopher K WikleDepartment of Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Funding

Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration F-57-RU.S. Geological Survey Northeast and Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Center G22AC00597-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relative abundance, measured as the number of animals caught per unit of sampling effort (catch per unit effort, CPUE), is commonly used to monitor fish and wildlife populations, largely because sampling methods are cost-effective to implement. Modeling relative abundance from CPUE data, however, requires the assumption that the detection probability is constant across sampling events. This assumption is likely not valid, as the probability of detection often varies as a function of several factors, including the characteristics of individual animals and environmental conditions at the time of sampling. In contrast, methods to estimate absolute abundance, such as capture-recapture (CR), account for variable detection, but are often infeasible to implement across large spatiotemporal scales. Despite this, CR data are sometimes available for species of interest, albeit at smaller spatiotemporal extents. Leveraging information on detection probabilities from CR data to help inform estimates of widely available CPUE data could strengthen inferences about the status of fish and wildlife populations. We propose an approach to (1) learn the effect of environmental covariates on detection probabilities from CR data and (2) transfer these detection functions to CPUE models for improved inference. Shown empirically through a simulation study, this approach improves estimates of abundance and the ability to detect temporal trends. We apply our transfer learning method using CR and CPUE data to recreationally important smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) fisheries in Pennsylvania, USA rivers.

Indexed as

FishesModels, BiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationPopulation DensityTime FactorsBayesian transfer learningcapture–recapturecatch per unit effortheterogeneityhierarchical modeltemporal abundance

Identifiers

PMID42744411
PMCPMC13577825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.