Trial reportBMJ open2026
Men's experiences of multiple long-term conditions and/or disability in the UK Game of Stones weight management trial: a mixed-methods evaluation.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore experiences, health outcomes and retention of men with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and/or disability within the Game of Stones weight management randomised controlled trial (RCT).
designMixed-methods process evaluation within an RCT where secondary outcomes included the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), EQ-5D-5L anxiety and depression subscale, Patient Health Questionnaire-4 and retention. Semistructured interviews were conducted at 12 months and analysed using the framework method.
settingConducted across three UK trial centres: Belfast, Bristol and Glasgow.
participants585 men with obesity (mean (SD) age, 50.7 (13.3) years) were randomised to one of three groups: behavioural text messages with financial incentives, texts alone or waiting-list control. Interviews were conducted with 54 participants from the two intervention groups.
results235 (40%) participants lived with MLTCs, 181 (31%) had a single condition, 167 (29%) had no conditions and 165 (29%) had a disability. Of those with MLTCs, 99 were disabled and 93 were living in deprived areas. Participants with MLTCs and/or disability were older, fewer had a degree-level qualification and fewer were in full-time work. Retention at 12 months was higher for men with disability (76%) or no long-term conditions (75%) and lower for men with diabetes (65%). Self-reported weight stigma, well-being and quality-of-life scores improved or stayed the same for men living with MLTCs in the intervention groups; however, results for anxiety and depression screening scores were inconsistent. Participant experiences indicated complex dynamic health, social and life situations which could provide motivation to lose weight for some but not others. Hospitalisation and poor mobility, with inability to exercise, were demotivating for making changes to reach weight loss targets.
conclusionsMen living with MLTCs and/or disability varied from very successful weight loss and improved health to not prioritising or feeling helped by the programme or disengagement due to immobility or diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN91974895.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.