ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2026
The recovery of valued occupations after intimate partner violence: A scoping review analysis using the Person Environment Occupation Performance model and an occupational justice lens.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The recovery of valued occupations after intimate partner violence: A scoping review analysis using the Person Environment Occupation Performance model and an occupational justice lens.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntimate partner violence has enduring impacts that persist well beyond the cessation of abuse. Recovery and healing, though recognised as a priority in the Australian Government's national policy, has received less research attention compared with prevention, early intervention, and response. Survivors experience interruptions to their occupations during abuse and face occupational injustice. There is limited understanding of how these occupations recover and whether occupational justice is restored during the recovery phase.
methodsThis scoping review aimed to (1) identify occupational focus and gaps in literature during IPV recovery and healing; (2) analyse person and environmental barriers and enablers associated with survivors' occupational recovery; and (3) examine restoration of occupational justice during recovery. The review followed the PRISMA-ScR Checklist for screening and data extraction. Comprehensive searches of databases and grey literature were conducted. The Person Environment Occupational Performance model guided keyword selection and data synthesis. There was no consumer or community involvement included.
resultsTwenty articles were reviewed, with findings primarily centred on paid employment, reflecting the research focus on this productive occupation. Parenting and ongoing education were also examined. Barriers to occupational recovery included physical health impacts, ongoing trauma, depression and anxiety, limited social supports, discrimination, ongoing coercive control, and restricted access to housing, transport, and childcare. These results were then interpreted through an occupational justice lens, including the persisting limit to choice and control in occupations for survivors, which results in continued occupational injustices.
conclusionThe review highlighted some of the complex person and environment factors affecting occupational recovery for women after IPV, particularly regarding access to meaningful paid employment. The findings underscore the need for both individualised support and broader systemic changes to achieve occupational justice and promote meaningful recovery. Further research is recommended to explore barriers and enablers beyond employment within the Australian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.