Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743974›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026

From prior knowledge to data-informed models: a review of Boolean network inference.

Pierre Klemmer, Ahmed Abdelmonem Hemedan, Reinhard Schneider, Marek Ostaszewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pierre KlemmerBioinformatics Core, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 7 Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, Esch-sur-Alzette 4362, Luxembourg.ORCID 0009-0006-9391-1285
Ahmed Abdelmonem HemedanTransversal Translational Medicine, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), 1 A-B Rue Thomas Edison, Strassen 1445, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0001-7403-181X
Reinhard SchneiderBioinformatics Core, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 7 Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, Esch-sur-Alzette 4362, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-8278-1618
Marek OstaszewskiBioinformatics Core, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 7 Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, Esch-sur-Alzette 4362, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-1473-370X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular mechanisms are highly complex and involve numerous components in non-linear interactions, imposing challenges in analysis and understanding. Networks provide intuitive representations of these systems, enabling visualisation of experimental data and the aggregation of prior knowledge. However, static networks cannot account for key temporal dynamics. Boolean networks address this limitation as discrete dynamical models representing temporal properties of biological regulation through binary variables connected by logical functions, offering scalable frameworks for hypothesis generation while avoiding parameterisation challenges of quantitative modelling approaches. Construction of (Boolean) networks is a mostly manual, labour-intensive and bias-prone process, relying on the review of a large corpora of prior knowledge. This review surveys methods for Boolean network inference that integrate experimental data with or without prior knowledge to automatically construct context-specific, data-informed models. We begin by examining network curation methods from text mining to manual curation given their use as backbones of Boolean networks, then analyse several inference algorithms categorised as heuristic (MIBNI, ATEN, LogicGep, CANTATA, and CellNetOptimizer) and exact (BoNesis, caspo, Sketchbook, RE:IN, and Griffin) methods. For each method, we discuss computational representation, inputs, inference algorithms, and benchmarking. We identify key considerations for method selection, including handling of uncertainty, choice of updating scheme, scalability, and data discretisation challenges. We advise that method selection be guided by the type and extent of available prior knowledge and experimental data, and modelling objectives.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsData MiningHumansboolean network inferenceoptimisationprior knowledgesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID42743974
PMCPMC13577669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.