Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743918›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2026

A Diagnostic Algorithm Based on Urine Antigen and Blood Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing for Visceral Leishmaniasis in HIV-Coinfected Patients in Northwest Ethiopia.

Ermias Diro, Koert Ritmeijer, Saskia van Henten, Aderajew Kibret, Mekibib Kassa, Hailemariam Beyene, Wim Adriaensen, Myrthe Pareyn, Johan van Griensven

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03013673 (Predicting Visceral Leishmaniasis in HIV Infected Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03013673 terminatednot on this map

Predicting Visceral Leishmaniasis in HIV Infected Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitute of Tropical Medicine, BelgiumRan2017 to 2021Enrolled566ConditionsLeishmaniasis, VisceralArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ermias DiroDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Koert RitmeijerMédecins sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia van HentenInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Aderajew KibretMédecins sans Frontières, Abdurafi, Ethiopia.
Mekibib KassaLeishmaniasis Research and Treatment Center, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Hailemariam BeyeneMédecins sans Frontières, Abdurafi, Ethiopia.
Wim AdriaensenInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Myrthe PareynInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Johan van GriensvenInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in HIV patients relies on tissue aspiration, which is potentially life-threatening. Because antibody-based tests are unreliable for this group, Leishmania blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and urine antigen tests can serve as noninvasive alternatives. Using data from the PreLeisH cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03013673]), the diagnostic accuracy of these two tests was determined individually, and an algorithm was designed for targeted tissue aspiration. Of the 490 PreLeish participants, 51 underwent diagnostic procedures for VL 118 times at different follow-up time points when clinically suspected. Of these, 48 (94.1%) patients with 102 (84.4%) procedures had complete data, including tissue aspiration, Leishmania kinetoplast DNA blood PCR, and urine antigen (KAtex [Kalon Biological Ltd., Guildford, United Kingdom]) results. The diagnostic performance of KAtex and blood PCR testing was assessed individually against tissue aspiration, and sequential and parallel algorithms were developed. Visceral leishmaniasis was confirmed via tissue microscopy in 55/102 (54%) episodes. The sensitivity and specificity of blood PCR testing were 98% and 64%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of KAtex testing were 93% and 81%, respectively. A sequential algorithm using KAtex first and restricting PCR to KAtex-negative suspects limited PCR testing to 42 (41.2%) episodes and tissue aspiration to 14 (13.7%) episodes, with sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of 100%, 81%, and 86%, respectively. The parallel testing algorithm exhibited comparable performance but requires PCR testing for all suspects. The sequential KAtex and PCR testing algorithm, combined with targeted tissue aspiration, met the WHO target product profile, except for specificity. This approach supports efficient resource use and reduces the need for invasive procedures.

Identifiers

PMID42743918
PMCPMC13590951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.