ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2026
Reactivation of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Undergoing Tocilizumab Treatment.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a neglected vector-borne disease caused by Leishmania spp., with viable parasites potentially persisting after clinical cure. Immunosuppressive therapies may favor reactivation of latent infection. The case of a 62-year-old Brazilian woman with a 25-year history of rheumatoid arthritis who developed a painful ulcerative lesion on her right leg 1 month after initiating tocilizumab therapy is reported. Molecular testing confirmed Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis, consistent with reactivated cutaneous leishmaniasis. Tocilizumab was discontinued, and liposomal amphotericin B was initiated but interrupted because of nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Despite incomplete treatment, the lesion gradually healed after withdrawal of immunosuppression without requiring additional antiparasitic therapy. Secondary prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B was subsequently initiated under close clinical and laboratory monitoring, and no recurrence has been observed during follow-up. This case highlights the importance of screening clinical history for prior leishmaniasis, maintaining vigilance for reactivation in patients from endemic areas, and promptly adjusting immunosuppressive therapy to optimize clinical outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.