Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743731›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Sex-dependent responses to posthatch protein-reduced feeding in broilers derived from low-protein-fed hens.

Li Zhang, Yaqin Li, Yurou Pan, Yue Xuan, Keying Zhang, Xuemei Ding, Qiufeng Zeng, Shiping Bai, Jingbo Liu, Yan Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Li ZhangKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China; State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. Electronic address: zl9588623@163.com.
Yaqin LiKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: liyaqin.99@qq.com.
Yurou PanKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: panyurou2022@163.com.
Yue XuanKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: 371834572@qq.com.
Keying ZhangKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: zkeying@sicau.edu.cn.
Xuemei DingKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: dingxuemei@sicau.edu.cn.
Qiufeng ZengKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: zqf@sicau.edu.cn.
Shiping BaiKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: shipingbai@sicau.edu.cn.
Jingbo LiuCollege of Life Sciences and Agri-forestry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010, PR China. Electronic address: liuswust@163.com.
Yan LiuKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: liuyan12334@163.com.
Jianping WangKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: wangjianping@sicau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the sex-dependent responses of broiler offspring derived from low-protein-fed hens to posthatch low-protein feeding, with emphasis on growth efficiency, carcass traits, amino acid metabolism, breast meat quality, and breast muscle transcriptomic profiles. A total of 312 broiler offspring were assigned to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with 2 posthatch dietary protein levels and 2 sexes and reared to 84 d. The low-protein diet represented a practical protein-reduced formulation in which Lys, Met, Thr, and Trp were supplemented, whereas Arg, Leu, Ile, and Val were not fully equalized with the normal-protein diet. Posthatch low-protein feeding reduced final body weight and increased feed-to-gain ratio. A significant posthatch dietary protein level × sex interaction was observed for average daily gain (P = 0.031), with the reduction occurring in males but not in females. Low-protein feeding decreased breast muscle yield (P = 0.005) and increased abdominal fat yield (P = 0.002). Serum triglyceride (P = 0.022), uric acid (P = 0.001), and several free amino acids, including Lys (P = 0.026), Thr (P < 0.001), Val (P = 0.009), Leu (P = 0.006), Ile (P = 0.030), Phe (P < 0.001), and Met (P = 0.016), were increased, whereas intestinal morphology was largely unaffected. In breast muscle, low-protein feeding increased Val (P = 0.005) and Pro (P = 0.016) concentrations and altered meat quality traits, including pH45min (P = 0.001), pH24h (P = 0.030), and b* (P < 0.001), with significant posthatch dietary protein level × sex interactions for L* (P = 0.006), a* (P = 0.003), and cooking loss (P < 0.001). Transcriptomic analysis showed sex-specific breast muscle responses, with females showing broader changes in signaling- and stress-related pathways, whereas males showed pathway changes more closely related to amino acid metabolism, protein turnover, and metabolic regulation. In conclusion, among broilers derived from low-protein-fed hens, the posthatch protein-reduced dietary strategy altered growth efficiency, carcass nutrient partitioning, amino acid profiles, breast meat quality, and breast muscle transcriptomic responses in a sex-dependent manner. These findings indicate that sex should be considered when evaluating responses to posthatch protein-reduced feeding in broilers derived from low-protein-fed hens.

Indexed as

Breast muscleBroiler offspringPosthatch low-protein feedingSex-dependent response

Identifiers

PMID42743731
PMCPMC13594873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.