Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743682›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026

The developing adolescent brain: Implications for youth justice and children in criminal proceedings.

Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarah-Jayne BlakemoreDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: sjblakemore@psychol.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a unique developmental stage, defined by neural reorganisation and a heightened sensitivity to the social environment. Brain maturation is a prolonged process extending well into the twenties, involving microstructural refinements such as axonal myelination and synaptic pruning, which are partly dependent on environmental input. This period of heightened neuroplasticity coincides with a shift toward peer affiliation and increased susceptibility to risk-taking, particularly in social settings. Consequently, adolescent decision-making should be viewed through a social lens, in which the drive to avoid social exclusion and to secure peer acceptance acts as a powerful motivator of behaviour. This framework underscores the importance of social connections and suggests that, conversely, disruptions to these relationships, and in particular social isolation, can be harmful to adolescent development. Studies have demonstrated that even brief periods of social isolation in adolescence can increase reward seeking and reward learning, heighten threat sensitivity and reduce risk perception. The research reviewed in this paper has implications for how young people are treated in the youth justice system. I argue that justice systems should evolve from punitive approaches toward rehabilitative frameworks and age-appropriate legal thresholds grounded in evidence-based insights into the developing adolescent brain and mind.

Indexed as

Criminal justice systemJoint enterpriseJuvenile justiceMinimum age of criminal responsibilityPeer influenceTeenage brainYouth justice

Identifiers

PMID42743682
PMCPMC13595075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.