ReviewThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2026
Challenges and opportunities in ECMO monitoring: A mixed-methods appraisal.
Review in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides heart/lung support for critically ill patients. While advances in research have improved the overall design and performance of ECMO circuits, complications such as hemolysis and thrombosis persist, and the dysfunction of the ECMO machine itself can pose significant risk to patients. Many parameters need to be closely monitored during an ECMO run, and it is often labor and resource-intensive. Currently, there are few commercially available automated ECMO circuit monitoring systems that can provide continuous, holistic monitoring for ECMO circuit health and provide real-time clinical recommendations. This mixed-methods review (through literature review and customer discovery interviews) discussed key parameters relevant to ECMO circuits and monitoring, including bleeding, thrombosis, hemolysis, flow and pressure conditions, and gas exchange. Their importance in ECMO monitoring, current practices, and available technologies were highlighted. In addition, a customer discovery study, supported by the New York regional I-Corps program, was conducted to identify the "pain points" in ECMO circuit monitoring through interviews with healthcare professionals and other stakeholders experienced in ECMO care/use. Findings from both the literature review and the customer discovery study indicated that ECMO monitoring and management require significant resources, due to the variability and complexity of patients' conditions, challenges in collecting patient and ECMO circuit data, and the need for a comprehensive understanding of the entire patient-ECMO ecosystem. Improvements in understanding complex ECMO data, incorporating new sensors into the monitoring system, and establishing comprehensive ECMO data pipelines represent key steps towards developing "smart" ECMO monitoring that can serve as a clinical decision support system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.