Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743367›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Inferring effective neuronal circuits via network flux counting.

Kevin S Chen, Ying-Jen Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin S ChenQuantitative Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-4625
Ying-Jen YangLaufer Center of Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2559-2773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracting circuit mechanisms from neuronal population activity is challenging due to the heterogeneous neuronal properties and diverse strengths in synaptic connections. Standard inference methods, such as Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), typically regress for parameters on all neuronal activity at once. Such a global fitting approach can face identifiability difficulties-for example, where the statistical estimation of strong, opposing weights becomes ill-conditioned in excitatory-inhibitory balanced networks. Here, we introduce FLux-based Effective Coupling (FLEC), a framework that maps spike trains directly to probability fluxes on network state space. Instead of enforcing a single global fit, FLEC infers connectivity and response heterogeneity by quantifying transition rates for each network configuration independently. We demonstrate that FLEC outperforms GLMs and Granger Causality in strongly coupled networks while matching GLM's performance in standard regimes. Additionally, when combined with Maximum Caliber to construct a minimal dynamical model, the framework better captures temporal statistics-such as inter-spike intervals-than Maximum Entropy models. Robust to parameter variations and unobserved hidden units, and applied to multi-electrode recordings from the salamander retina, FLEC offers a systematic, counting-based tool for inference in nonlinear neuronal circuits.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsCaudataComputational BiologyComputer SimulationLinear ModelsRetina

Identifiers

PMID42743367
PMCPMC13592720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.