ArticlePloS one2026
Census-based adolescent depression risk assessment: A novel method and reflections.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosing psychological issues in adolescents is generally more challenging than in adults. The need to enhance early identification and risk assessment for adolescent mental health problems has become particularly urgent, especially given the surge in such issues brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic and its isolation policies. Traditional approaches relying on scales or interviews can be difficult to administer at scale and may miss at-risk youths, while recent attempts at artificial intelligence-assisted clinical diagnosis have not yet achieved consistent performance for routine clinical use. Using youth census survey data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) from 2020 to 2022 (147,772 samples), we propose a novel data synthesis and training management method tailored for imbalanced health data, and develop a heuristic decision model based on daily-life indicators to predict survey-reported adolescent depression risk. Experimental results demonstrate that our data management approach improves the average accuracy of conventional models by 14%. Compared with general artificial intelligence methods, the proposed decision model achieves higher accuracy, precision, and sensitivity. Built on AutoML, the model can adapt to factor replacement and incremental data updates, supporting scalable screening workflows and model maintenance. Using Shapley values, we identify several key daily-life factors associated with adolescent depression risk, such as social interactions and sleep duration. The interpretability analysis further supports the utility of our approach for risk stratification and practical decision support, rather than replacing clinician-administered diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.