ArticlePloS one2026
Multi-view attention-based deep learning for benign-malignant classification of pulmonary nodules.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate classification of pulmonary nodules is essential for early lung cancer diagnosis, yet the limited spatial information provided by a single computed tomography slice may hinder the characterization of complex nodule morphology. Although multi-view strategies can capture complementary anatomical information, conventional fusion methods often fail to account for lesion-specific features and differences in the contribution of individual views. To address these limitations, we propose a tri-view pulmonary nodule classification framework that combines Lesion-Guided Attention (LGA) with View-Weighted Fusion (VWF). The framework extracts complementary representations from axial, coronal, and sagittal slices. LGA introduces lesion masks as weak spatial priors to refine lesion-related feature responses while preserving contextual information, whereas VWF learns sample-dependent weights to adaptively aggregate the three view representations. The framework was evaluated on 869 nodules (448 benign and 421 malignant) derived from the public Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative (LIDC-IDRI) dataset. It achieved an accuracy of 93.08%, an AUC of 97.06%, and an F1-score of 92.68%, representing the highest values for these three metrics among the models included in the baseline comparison. Ablation analysis further showed that the combined use of LGA and VWF provided the best overall balance among the evaluated configurations. In the displayed test cases, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping visualizations showed that the learned responses were concentrated mainly within or adjacent to lesion-relevant regions. These findings support the potential value of combining lesion-aware feature refinement with adaptive multi-view fusion for pulmonary nodule classification within the evaluated LIDC-IDRI cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.