ArticlePloS one2026
Development and validation of dysphagia knowledge and self-reported competence questionnaire for nurses.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysphagia is a common condition across healthcare settings and is associated with serious complications. Nurses play a key role in early identification and safe management. However, substantial gaps exist in nurses' knowledge and competence. The scope of existing dysphagia questionnaires is limited, and most are designed for specialised populations. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive tool to assess nurses' knowledge and perceived competence in dysphagia care.
methodsThe Dysphagia Knowledge and Self-reported Competence Questionnaire for Nurses (DKSCQ-N) was developed and validated in two phases. Phase 1 included item generation through literature review, mapping items across six domains, and expert evaluation using a Table of Specification and the Content Validity Index. Cognitive interviews with nurses were conducted to assess clarity, relevance and usability. In Phase 2, data were collected from 537 nurses from hospitals across Pakistan to establish reliability and construct validity. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and convergent validity.
resultsExpert review demonstrated strong content validity (S-CVI = 0.95). Minor revisions were made after cognitive interviews to improve clarity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 21-item, two-factor model with acceptable fit (χ2/df = 4.062, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.921, RMSEA = 0.076, GFI = 0.88). Both factors demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. Significant correlation between the signs and symptoms, complication and management domains of DKSCQ-N and Dysphagia knowledge Scale supported convergent validity. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.906) and test-retest reliability indicated excellent stability over two-weeks period (ICC = 0.829).
conclusionThe DKSCQ-N is a valid and reliable instrument to assess dysphagia knowledge and self-reported competence of nurses. It provides a comprehensive and contextually relevant measure that can help identify learning needs and assess training outcomes in hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.