Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743309›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

PSAFM: A parameter-free spatial attention fusion module.

Guangjun Liu, Xiaoping Xu, Bingkun Zhou, Feng Wang, Yike Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guangjun LiuSchool of Ecological Environment and Chemical Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, P. R. China.
Xiaoping XuSchool of Mathematics, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, P. R. China.
Bingkun ZhouSchool of Mathematics, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, P. R. China.
Feng WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P. R. China.
Yike LiDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention mechanisms improve convolutional neural networks (CNNs) by emphasizing informative features, but many existing modules introduce additional parameters, convolutional or fully connected layers, and non-negligible computational overhead. These costs may limit their use in lightweight or plug-and-play CNN architectures. To address this issue, this paper proposes a parameter-free spatial attention fusion module (PSAFM). Specifically, the pointwise average- and max-pooling branches are combined by deterministic weighted fusion, after which channel statistics and a Tanh activation are used to compute adaptive three-dimensional attention weights. This enables the module to strengthen feature responses without adding trainable parameters. We evaluate PSAFM on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 using ResNet, Pre-ResNet, and MobileNetV2 backbones. On CIFAR-10, PSAFM achieves the best accuracy in 8 of 9 tested backbone settings and improves the original backbones by 0.32 to 1.81 percentage points. On CIFAR-100, PSAFM achieves the best accuracy in 6 of 9 settings and improves the original backbones by 0.05 to 1.68 percentage points. In these experiments, PSAFM is compared with representative attention modules. The results show that its parameter count remains essentially unchanged and that only a small FLOPs overhead is introduced. In other words, when model compactness is important, PSAFM is a simple and efficient attention module that improves CNN feature representation.

Indexed as

AttentionAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumans

Identifiers

PMID42743309
PMCPMC13577465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.