ArticlePloS one2026
PSAFM: A parameter-free spatial attention fusion module.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention mechanisms improve convolutional neural networks (CNNs) by emphasizing informative features, but many existing modules introduce additional parameters, convolutional or fully connected layers, and non-negligible computational overhead. These costs may limit their use in lightweight or plug-and-play CNN architectures. To address this issue, this paper proposes a parameter-free spatial attention fusion module (PSAFM). Specifically, the pointwise average- and max-pooling branches are combined by deterministic weighted fusion, after which channel statistics and a Tanh activation are used to compute adaptive three-dimensional attention weights. This enables the module to strengthen feature responses without adding trainable parameters. We evaluate PSAFM on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 using ResNet, Pre-ResNet, and MobileNetV2 backbones. On CIFAR-10, PSAFM achieves the best accuracy in 8 of 9 tested backbone settings and improves the original backbones by 0.32 to 1.81 percentage points. On CIFAR-100, PSAFM achieves the best accuracy in 6 of 9 settings and improves the original backbones by 0.05 to 1.68 percentage points. In these experiments, PSAFM is compared with representative attention modules. The results show that its parameter count remains essentially unchanged and that only a small FLOPs overhead is introduced. In other words, when model compactness is important, PSAFM is a simple and efficient attention module that improves CNN feature representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.