ReviewPLoS computational biology2026
Ten quick tips for spatial transcriptomics analysis.
Review in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables genome-wide gene expression profiling while retaining spatial context within tissue sections. Since the foundational work by Ståhl et al. in 2016, the field has expanded rapidly, with diverse platforms now spanning sequencing-based (e.g., Visium, Visium HD, Slide-seq, Stereo-seq, and Seq-Scope) and imaging-based (e.g., MERFISH, Xenium, and CosMx SMI) approaches. The breadth of platforms, data structures, and computational tools, however, can be daunting for newcomers. Here, we present ten quick tips spanning the entire ST research workflow: whether ST suits a given biological question, how to select a platform aligned with study objectives, how to understand and process ST data, and which software tools to employ for analysis and visualization. We further discuss interpreting spatial patterns in biological context, integrating complementary modalities such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial proteomics, and leveraging public datasets and sharing results. Finally, we highlight current limitations of ST, particularly the challenge of reconstructing three-dimensional tissue architecture from serial tissue sections. This review provides biologists, bioinformaticians, and clinician-scientists with a concise, platform-neutral roadmap for incorporating ST into research, from experimental design to biological discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.