Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743262›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2026

Ten quick tips for spatial transcriptomics analysis.

Nagomi Kurogi, Koki Shimbara, Tatsuya Koreeda, Koki Tsuyuzaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nagomi KurogiGraduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Koki ShimbaraBaraPhaSilico, Ibaraki, Japan.
Tatsuya KoreedaCLINIC FOR Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Koki TsuyuzakiData Science Core, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-2148

Funding

JSPS KAKENHIJST A-STEP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables genome-wide gene expression profiling while retaining spatial context within tissue sections. Since the foundational work by Ståhl et al. in 2016, the field has expanded rapidly, with diverse platforms now spanning sequencing-based (e.g., Visium, Visium HD, Slide-seq, Stereo-seq, and Seq-Scope) and imaging-based (e.g., MERFISH, Xenium, and CosMx SMI) approaches. The breadth of platforms, data structures, and computational tools, however, can be daunting for newcomers. Here, we present ten quick tips spanning the entire ST research workflow: whether ST suits a given biological question, how to select a platform aligned with study objectives, how to understand and process ST data, and which software tools to employ for analysis and visualization. We further discuss interpreting spatial patterns in biological context, integrating complementary modalities such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial proteomics, and leveraging public datasets and sharing results. Finally, we highlight current limitations of ST, particularly the challenge of reconstructing three-dimensional tissue architecture from serial tissue sections. This review provides biologists, bioinformaticians, and clinician-scientists with a concise, platform-neutral roadmap for incorporating ST into research, from experimental design to biological discovery.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSpatial TranscriptomicsAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansProteomicsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID42743262
PMCPMC13577581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.