ArticlePloS one2026
Differential effects of free viewing and goal-directed search on visual attention: An eye-tracking study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In natural scenes, human gaze behavior is driven jointly by external stimuli from scene characteristics and individual internal goals. To investigate the influence of these two factors on gaze behavior, this paper systematically analyzes eye movement behavior under two task paradigms: free viewing and goal-directed search. First, the guiding effects of different hierarchical visual features on fixation behavior under the two task conditions are analyzed. Second, the differences in eye movement trajectory characteristics between the two task paradigms are compared. Finally, the CNN-TransGaze model is proposed to distinguish eye movement behavior patterns under different task conditions. The results show that shape, location and orientation features exhibit strong fixation attraction under both task paradigms, while semantic features are significantly enhanced in goal-directed search compared with free viewing. There are significant differences in eye movement behavior characteristics between the two task scenarios. Moreover, compared with traditional statistical feature extraction methods, deep learning models can capture latent high-dimensional features more effectively, thereby enabling accurate discrimination of distinct eye movement patterns. Efficient feature extraction from diverse eye movement patterns using deep learning enables the implementation of relevant applications, such as distinguishing healthy individuals from patients with abnormal eye movement patterns caused by neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.