Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743202›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Preparing current and emerging health leaders: An innovative competency-based framework for health diplomacy.

Esperanza Martinez, Ellen Rosskam, Garry Aslanyan, Lyndsay Baines, Ryuichi Komatsu, Nikica Darabos, Brian Li Han Wong, Nina Viberg, Mariko Hososawa, Ren Minghui and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Esperanza MartinezCollege of Law, Governance and Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7555-5332
Ellen RosskamGlobal Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2601-573X
Garry AslanyanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-8406
Lyndsay BainesWolfson College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ryuichi KomatsuInterfaculty Initiative in Planetary Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Nikica DarabosFaculty of Economics, Business and Tourism and the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Split, Croatia.
Brian Li Han WongDepartment of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8709-5847
Nina VibergDepartment of Global Public Health and Center of Excellence for Sustainable Health, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3495-8773
Mariko HososawaInstitute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of Global Health Cooperation, Japan Institution for Health Security, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6886-5156
Ren MinghuiDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2475-4010
Magda Robalo Correia E SilvaInstitute for Global Health and Development, Guinea-Bissau.
Anders NordstromDepartment of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-8683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health diplomacy is increasingly recognized as critical domain of practice for advancing global health equity, navigating political complexity, and fostering cooperation across sectors and borders. Yet formal training opportunities remain limited worldwide, with existing programs differing in length, depth and content, and lacking a shared core curriculum. To address these persistent gaps, the Health Diplomacy Institutional Network (HDIN) developed a globally informed, competency-based training framework that contributes to the professionalization of the field by offering a shared foundation for capacity building in health diplomacy. Co-developed by global experts and practitioners, the framework identifies five key competencies - global health knowledge, political and diplomatic acumen, strategic leadership, cross-cultural communication, and advocacy and coalition-building - each articulated across four progressive levels of mastery, from basic to expert. This structure enables institutions to align training content with learners' roles, experience levels, and contexts. The framework's flexible, outcomes-based design allows for adaptation across institutional missions, educational formats, and geopolitical settings. Accompanied by practical implementation tools, the HDIN Training Framework supports high-quality, context-responsive capacity-building for academic institutions, governments, NGOs, and multilateral organizations. It aims to equip a health diplomacy workforce capable of advancing health priorities amid intensifying global interdependence and uncertainty.

Identifiers

PMID42743202
PMCPMC13577546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.