ArticlePloS one2026
Safety profile of entrectinib in NSCLC: Multi-source pharmacovigilance analysis using FAERS and JADER.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEntrectinib is effective for ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its postmarketing safety profile remains incompletely characterized outside clinical trials. We conducted a dual-database pharmacovigilance study to characterize real-world reporting patterns, identify cross-database replicated adverse event signals, explore age- and sex-related reporting heterogeneity, and evaluate time-to-onset patterns.
methodsReports were retrieved from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS; 2020Q1-2025Q4; 520 patients; 1,573 preferred-term [PT] events) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER; 2020Q1-2025Q3; 254 patients; 393 PT events). Molecular fusion status was not available for verification. Four disproportionality methods were applied, with reporting odds ratio (ROR) as the primary signal criterion.
resultsAt the system organ class level, shared positive signals involved nervous system disorders (FAERS/JADER ROR: 4.48/4.76), cardiac disorders (3.20/5.43), and renal and urinary disorders (2.04/3.92). At the PT level, 23 signals were detected in both databases, whereas 58 PTs were unique to FAERS and 8 to JADER. Representative shared PT signals included dizziness (12.94/14.33), taste disorder (38.03/13.28), renal impairment (6.89/8.18), blood creatinine increased (8.31/24.99), cardiac failure (7.57/8.90), cognitive disorder (18.04/78.29), ataxia (51.73/351.45), syncope (8.87/89.45), myocarditis (3.47/5.91), electrocardiogram QT prolonged (4.01/5.35), and hyperuricaemia (7.36/59.63). Subgroup analyses suggested exploratory age- and sex-related reporting heterogeneity, including relatively more renal and mobility-related reports in older patients and female predominance for ataxia in FAERS. In the FAERS-based time-to-onset analysis, 203 of 520 reports (39.0%) had valid onset data. The median time to onset was 13 days, 70.94% of evaluable reports had onset dates within 30 days, and Weibull analysis suggested an early-failure pattern.
conclusionsEntrectinib-associated reports in NSCLC showed reproducible neurologic, cardiac, renal, and laboratory-related disproportional reporting signals across FAERS and JADER. These findings may help prioritize early safety monitoring but should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating signals rather than evidence of incidence or causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.