ArticlePloS one2026
Growing palliative and end-of-life care research in the United Kingdom: Findings from a mixed methods survey.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally the number of people with an advanced progressive illness is increasing. Research is essential to inform policy, services and clinical practice to meet their needs. We investigated researcher perspectives on conducting palliative and end-of-life care research in the United Kingdom and what is needed to grow this field.
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods online survey of individuals conducting palliative and end-of-life care research in an academic institution or any care setting. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed using a Framework Method.
resultsOverall, 256 people involved in palliative and end-of-life care research responded (80% female, 85% white, 83% aged over 35). Most worked at a university (79%), 67% worked full-time, 47% had a permanent contract and 9% were clinical academics. Many reported positive aspects of their working environment, such as a collaborative culture and research rigour. Nearly all (90%) wished to continue palliative and end-of-life care research during the next five years, however only 69% believed this was likely. Most common barriers were lack of funding (56%), heavy workload (42%), job insecurity (39%), and limited career progression opportunities (33%). To sustain and grow research activity, participants identified a need for: (i) Greater visibility of palliative and end-of-life care as a vital research field; (ii) Increased funding to support those undertaking palliative and end-of-life care research, across career stages and disciplines; (iii) Increased opportunities for collaboration and networking; (iv) Protected research time, and (v) Support to build a more diverse research community.
conclusionsDespite a committed workforce, palliative and end-of-life care research lacks visibility and funding. Increased visibility through knowledge exchange and impact activities, alongside more targeted research funding opportunities, are essential to build research capacity for the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.