Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743128›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2026

Situational analysis.

Adam Christianson, Patricia Thille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam ChristiansonFamily Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1613-4049
Patricia ThillePhysical Therapy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-9818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Situational analysis is a qualitative method that allows the analyst to examine highly complex and locally specific situations. As primary care evolves to include increasingly specialized and varied interprofessional collaborative and person-centered care teams, this method may prove valuable to understanding how such teams operate. Situational analysis, an offshoot of grounded theory, provides an accessible but robust methodology for analyzing the situations researchers are interested in and the kind of differences that exist within them, such as situations where groups intersect while working together to deliver healthcare, while holding different views. Situational analysis involves three analytic steps, specifically, mapping data in three different ways. The outcomes of a situational analysis can, i.e. highlight the groups that are included in the given situation, those that are only spoken about, and those that are neglected entirely, as well as the values, preferences, and evidence that may be emphasized differently across given healthcare or policy contexts. In this methods brief, we describes situational analysis, its strengths, and assumptions and illustrated how it has been used successfully in health and social care research settings.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareCooperative BehaviorGrounded TheoryGroup DynamicsHumansPatient-Centered CareQualitative Researchconstructivismgrounded theoryinterprofessional collaborationprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID42743128
PMCPMC13576736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.