Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743122›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Mixed methods investigation into provision of family rooms and support for parents admitted to psychiatric inpatient units and their children: Study protocol.

Abby Dunn, Chloe Elsby-Pearson, Luise Kalus, Mark Oliver, Eleanor Ratcliffe, Sam Cartwright-Hatton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abby DunnDepartment of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1911-414X
Chloe Elsby-PearsonSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Luise KalusDepartment of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Mark OliverExpert by Experience Co-Applicant, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom.
Eleanor RatcliffeUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Sam Cartwright-HattonDepartment of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOf 97,000 psychiatric inpatient admissions in England in 2022, 12-45% are thought to have had dependent children. The hospitalisation of parents requires separation from children; this is a source of distress for both parents and their children and can exacerbate parental symptoms, disrupt the parent-child relationship and is associated with negative child outcomes. Currently, most psychiatric wards have inadequate provision for child visitation, including unsatisfactory family rooms. Improved provision for family visits has been identified as a mechanism through which parent-child connection could be improved (1,2). This study aims to capture the perception and experience of family visitations during parents' psychiatric hospitalisation from the perspective of parents, carers, children and young people (CYP) and healthcare professionals (HCP).

methodsThe study employs an exploratory sequential mixed method design in which qualitative data collected during online interviews (work package 1) will inform the design of a subsequent questionnaire (work package 2). The results of both will be utilised to inform the co-production process for a future Family Visit Pack. Participants (12-16 parents, 6-10 carers, 12-16 HCP) will partake in 0-60-minute semi-structured interviews. In additional 6-10 CYPs will partake in interviews, using the "draw, write, tell" approach to share their experiences. The data from these interviews will be transcribed, anonymised and analysed with a five-stage framework analysis. Results from the interviews will inform the questionnaires for work package 2 which 50 parents, 25 HCPs and 25 carers will complete. Qualitative data will be subject to framework analysis and descriptive statistics will be generated from the questionnaire data. Development of topic guides, interview administration, framework analysis and questionnaire development will be supported by lived experience researchers. DISCUSSION: This research will allow a better understanding of the experiences of families when visiting parents in inpatient units, as well as exploring which environmental and service delivery changes are priorities for parents, CYP, carers and HCPs. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: IRAS Number: IRAS 340906. ISRCTN - The UK's Clinical Study Registry: ISRCTN69583343, registered 24/02/2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN69583343.

Indexed as

InpatientsParentsAdolescentCaregiversChildEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesVisitors to Patients

Identifiers

PMID42743122
PMCPMC13577376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.