ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026
Nursing students' perceptions of the use of clinical simulation in biosafety education.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo understand nursing students' perceptions of the use of clinical simulation in biosafety education.
methodA qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive study conducted in 2023 based on the implementation of clinical simulation for biosafety learning. Participants were 26 students enrolled in the "Fundamentals of Nursing" course of an undergraduate nursing program at a federal university in southern Brazil. Data were analyzed using IRAMUTEQ® software.
resultsThree categories emerged: (1) Emotional regulation for interaction and communication with patients and families, highlighting feelings of anxiety and the need for emotional regulation during the application of standard precautions; (2) Contributions of simulation to learning biosafety practices, emphasizing a better understanding of the use of personal protective equipment, risk perception, and the integration of theory and practice; and (3) Strengths and weaknesses perceived by students regarding their performance, including self-assessment, recognition of technical limitations, and strengthened teamwork.
conclusionClinical simulation was perceived as a strategy that promotes learning of biosafety practices by integrating technical, emotional, and communication-related aspects, thereby contributing to safer and more reflective professional education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.