Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42742909›Full record

ReviewJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026

Ablation with the circular pulsed field ablation catheter: Tips & techniques for using the PulseSelect catheter.

Gabriel Ballesteros, Sikder M Zubair Rahim, Faizel Osman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel BallesterosDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Sikder M Zubair RahimInstitute for Cardio-Metabolic Medicine, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Faizel OsmanInstitute for Cardio-Metabolic Medicine, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK. faizel.osman@uhcw.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel method of cardiac ablation in which electrical fields create microscopic pores in cardiomyocyte cell membranes, resulting in cell death through a process of electroporation. Unlike thermal technologies, PFA has preferential cardiomyocyte selectivity, thereby reducing the risk of collateral damage to surrounding structures. The PulseSelect PFA system (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) is a 9-electrode circular ablation catheter with a central guidewire used for atrial fibrillation ablation. Currently, there is no consensus on workflow or best practice for this catheter. Its distinctive over-the-wire design and forward-tilted flexible electrode array provide considerable procedural versatility and, in our opinion, may offer advantages in terms of selective lesion delivery, reduced haemolysis, and a lower propensity for coronary vasospasm. Realising these potential benefits, however, requires a thorough understanding of catheter geometry, tissue-contact principles, and manipulation techniques. We present our real-world experience from centres in the UK and Spain, highlighting practical concepts, fluoroscopic and electro-anatomic mapping (EAM) strategies, as well as procedural techniques that may help shorten the learning curve, optimise lesion delivery, and safely expand the use of the catheter beyond pulmonary vein isolation.

Indexed as

Ablation strategy.Atrial fibrillation ablationLesion optimizationPulmonary vein isolationPulsed field ablation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.