Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42742872›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026

Induction FLOT Chemotherapy Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in the Treatment of Lower Esophageal and Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Phase II, Single-Arm Clinical Trial.

Seyed Amir Aledavood, Zohreh Pishevar, Kazem Anvari, Ehsan Soltani, Ali Emadi Torghabe, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Soudeh Arastouei, Sare Hosseini

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seyed Amir AledavoodCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Zohreh PishevarCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. zohreh.pishevar@gmail.com.
Kazem AnvariCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ehsan SoltaniCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ali Emadi TorghabeCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Seyed Alireza JavadiniaNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran. javadinia.alireza@gmail.com.
Soudeh ArastoueiCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sare HosseiniCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goalSelecting the most effective treatment strategy for patients with distal esophageal and proximal gastric adenocarcinoma remains a clinical challenge. Although existing evidence supports the use of adjuvant therapies, the optimal sequencing of these treatments is still debated. Given that distant metastasis is the most common cause of death in this patient population, early initiation of systemic therapy may theoretically improve survival. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using the FLOT chemotherapy regimen as induction therapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in treating distal esophageal and proximal gastric cancer.

methodsIn this single-arm, phase II clinical trial, patients with resectable, locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and proximal stomach (T1-T4b, N0-N3, M0) who presented at two teaching hospitals affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Imam Reza and Omid Hospitals, Mashhad, Iran) were screened for eligibility. Eligible patients received two cycles of induction FLOT chemotherapy. This was followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisting of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin, with a total radiotherapy dose of 45-50.4 Gy delivered in 1.8-2 Gy/fraction. Surgery was performed 4-6 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathological tumor response.

resultsAmong the 57 enrolled patients, 40 (70.2%) underwent surgical resection and pathological evaluation (mean age: 56.5 ± 8.9 years, range: 24-64). Based on abdominal CT and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), most tumors were staged as T3 (23 patients, 40.4%) and N1 (26 patients, 45.6%). Induction FLOT was administered to all patients, with 51 patients (89.5%) completing both cycles. Additionally, the majority received more than four weekly cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (42 patients, 73.6%). Pathological examination of surgical specimens revealed a complete pathological response (pCR) in 11 patients (27.5%), partial response in 10 (25%), minimal response in 12 (30%), and poor response in 7 (17.5%). The neoadjuvant regimen was generally well tolerated, with most patients experiencing either no side effects or only Grade 1 hematologic or gastrointestinal toxicity.

conclusionInduction FLOT chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment strategy for patients with distal esophageal and proximal gastric adenocarcinoma, yielding complete pathological response in approximately one-third of surgically treated and pathologically evaluable patients.

trial registrationIRCT20210706051800N1 on 20,220,919.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEsophageal NeoplasmsInduction ChemotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedCarboplatinChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPathologic Complete ResponseCarboplatinPaclitaxelAdenocarcinomaGastroesophageal JunctionInduction ChemotherapyNeoadjuvant ChemoradiotherapyProximal StomachSiewert Classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.