ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Regional patterns of advanced therapy use and unmet disease control in axial spondyloarthritis across Latin America: a report from the ESPALDA-PANLAR registry.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate regional patterns of current biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD use in patients with axSpA across Latin America, explore clinical differences between patients receiving and not receiving b/tsDMARDs, and quantify disease activity among patients not receiving b/tsDMARDs.
methodsObservational, cross-sectional analysis of the PANLAR-ESPALDA registry. Adults fulfilling the ASAS 2009 criteria were included from nine countries and grouped into South (Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay), Andean (Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador), and North (Mexico) regions. Current b/tsDMARD use, drug class (TNFi, IL-17i, JAKi), and treatment line were recorded. Disease activity was assessed by BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP; unmet disease control was described among patients not receiving b/tsDMARDs.
resultsAmong 419 patients, 198 (45%) were receiving b/tsDMARDs (70% TNFi, 20% IL-17i, 10% JAKi); 66% were on first-line, 20% on second-line, and 13% on third-line b/tsDMARD therapy. Overall, treated patients more frequently had uveitis (59% vs 41%; p = 0.04), chronic MRI changes (56% vs 44%; p = 0.01), and a younger age at back pain onset (median 30 vs 36 years; p = 0.02). b/tsDMARD use varied by region (South 44%, Andean 43%, North 56%) with region-specific correlates. Among patients not receiving b/tsDMARDs (n = 206), BASDAI > 4 was observed in 50% across regions; ASDAS moderate/high disease activity remained common (South 42%/29%; Andean 37%/20%; North 39%/16%). Extra-musculoskeletal manifestations were frequent among patients not receiving b/tsDMARDs.
conclusionsIn this Latin American registry, current b/tsDMARD use varied across participating regions, while substantial disease activity persisted among many patients not receiving advanced therapies. These findings suggest potential unmet disease control in routine care, although treatment eligibility and factors influencing treatment decisions were not systematically captured. Key Points • Current b/ts DMARD use in ESPALDA varied across Latin American regions, ranging from 44 to 56%. • Patients receiving b/ts DMARDs more frequently had uveitis and chronic MRI changes and had earlier back pain onset. • Among patients not receiving b/tsDMARDs, half had BASDAI > 4 and many had moderate or high ASDAS disease activity, indicating persistent disease activity and potential unmet disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.