ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Irrigation performance of a 2-mm rigid cystoscope designed for neonatal cystoscopy: a bench study.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNeonatal and infant cystoscopy is limited by narrow urethral caliber and the lack of sufficiently small cystoscopes with adequate irrigation. We developed a 2-mm (6 Fr) rigid cystoscope prototype and evaluated irrigation performance in a benchtop open-flow system.
methodsThe prototype incorporated a 0.9-mm optical channel, a 0.7-mm working channel, and two irrigation lumens (0.48 mm each). Irrigation performance was assessed under gravity and cuff-assisted irrigation, including temperature-controlled experiments. The maximum cuff pressure of 300 mmHg was used as an upper-bound bench condition and was not intended to represent a recommended clinical setting. Outflow was measured gravimetrically, and mean flow was calculated over 60 s.
resultsGravity irrigation yielded 2.12-8.50 mL/min. Cuff-assisted irrigation increased flow from 17.39 mL/min at 150 mmHg to 40.40 mL/min at 300 mmHg (p < 0.001). At 300 mmHg, warming saline from 20 °C to 37 °C increased flow from 27.49 to 40.40 mL/min (p < 0.001). Probe insertion reduced flow by 4.4% (p = 0.157).
conclusionThe 2-mm rigid cystoscope achieved flows up to 40.4 mL/min, within the benchmark range adopted for this benchtop evaluation. These findings support benchtop technical feasibility of the irrigation design. Clinical safety and recommended irrigation pressures remain to be established in closed-system and in vivo studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.