Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42742794›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026

Psychological Autopsy Protocols - A Selective Narrative Review.

Sergio Sanz-Gómez, Adrián Alacreu-Crespo, Diego De la Vega-Sánchez, María Isabel Perea-González, Julio Guija, Lucas Giner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergio Sanz-GómezDepartament of Psychiatry, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain. ssanz1@us.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6801-0836
Adrián Alacreu-CrespoDepartment of Psychology and Sociology, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0633-2810
Diego De la Vega-SánchezDepartament of Psychiatry, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6038-7257
María Isabel Perea-GonzálezDepartament of Psychiatry, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-0591
Julio GuijaDepartament of Psychiatry, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8642-356X
Lucas GinerDepartament of Psychiatry, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5737-110X

Funding

Universidad de Sevilla VI-PPITUS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPsychological autopsy (PA) is a methodological approach aimed at reconstructing the psychological and contextual factors leading to an individual's death, particularly in cases of suicide. This article provides a comprehensive review of Psychological Autopsy Protocols, examining their evolution across the decades from the first generation of psychological autopsy studies to a second generation focusing on methodological improvements. RECENT

findingsMethodological aspects of psychological autopsies are discussed, emphasizing both strengths and limitations of the approach. The review then delves into specific PA protocols, showcasing prominent initiatives such as the National Suicide Prevention Project in Finland, McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Chinese PA Project, and the Spanish FRienDS project, as well as notable methodologies such as the SSIPA (Semi-Structured Interview for PA) and other psychological autopsy research efforts conducted globally. In conclusion, review consolidates knowledge on psychological autopsy protocols, providing a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers engaged in suicide prevention. The findings underscore the importance of refining methodologies and advancing the field to enhance our understanding of the aetiology of suicide.

Indexed as

Interview, PsychologicalSuicideAutopsyCause of DeathHumansSuicide PreventionAssessment methodsDeath by suicidePsychological autopsySuicidal behaviour

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.