ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Chidamide plus venetoclax as effective and safe maintenance therapy in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome post-transplantation.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the leading cause of treatment failure in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), yet effective maintenance strategies are currently lacking. The combination of chidamide (CHI) and venetoclax (VEN) represents a novel approach. However, real-world data on its use are limited. In this study, eighteen high-risk transplant recipients received maintenance therapy with CHI (5 mg/day on days 1-7 or 1-14) plus VEN (100 mg on day 1, then 200 mg on days 2-7 or 2-14) every 2 months. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and safety. After a median follow-up of 708 days, the 2-year OS and DFS were 73.9% and 56.6%, respectively. The 2-year CIR was 28.9%, and the 2-year NRM rate was 22.5%. The most common adverse events were hematologic, including neutropenia (13 episodes), thrombocytopenia (7), and anemia (7), all of which were manageable. No treatment-related mortality, tumor lysis syndrome, or severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred. In conclusion, CHI plus VEN as post-transplant maintenance therapy shows encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile in high-risk AML/MDS patients, representing a promising strategy for relapse prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.