Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42742759›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2026

A Flexible-Horizon Clinical Decision Support Model for Dementia Early Detection and Risk Prediction in Secondary Care: A Responsible AI Approach.

Adnane Ez-Zizi, Kalyan Seelam, Lisa Leggett, Bilal R Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adnane Ez-ZiziSchool of Business, Arts, Social Sciences and Technology, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, IP4 1QJ, UK. a.ez-zizi@uos.ac.uk.
Kalyan SeelamMemory Assessment & Support Service, South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, WF1 3SP, UK.
Lisa LeggettSchool of Business, Arts, Social Sciences and Technology, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, IP4 1QJ, UK.
Bilal R MalikBiomedical and Forensic Sciences, School of Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, DE22 1GB, UK.

Funding

National Alzheimer's Coordinating CenterU24AG072122 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHENS, KARI A · 2021 to 2025
$45.8M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Katherine P Rankin · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BRADFORD C DICKERSON · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center P30P30AG062429 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DOUGLAS R GALASKO · 2019 to 2026
$34.9M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sanjay Asthana · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062677 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KEJAL KANTARCI · 2019 to 2026
$33.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066514 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Margaret Sewell · 2020 to 2026
$31.0M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP30AG066508 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN M STRITTMATTER · 2020 to 2026
$30.2M
Research Education CoreP30AG066462 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PHILIP L DE JAGER · 2020 to 2026
$30.1M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066468 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI C. Elizabeth Shaaban · 2020 to 2026
$29.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
University of Washington Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066509 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Amanda D. Boyd · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068082NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062429NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062677NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066468NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066506NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066508NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066509NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066511NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066512NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066518NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066546NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072946NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072958NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072959NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072975NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072976NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072977NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072978NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072979NIA NIH HHS P30 AG086401NIA NIH HHS P30 AG086404NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079280NIA NIH HHS U24 AG072122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing machine learning (ML) models for dementia detection typically use fixed prediction windows and often lack clinically informed variable selection and responsible AI principles, thereby limiting performance, generalisability and clinical trust. We aimed to develop a single clinically informed model capable of both diagnosing dementia and predicting its onset over flexible time horizons up to 10 years. We trained our ML model on the NACC Uniform Data Set using 20 inputs compatible with UK National Healthcare Service secondary-care workflows, including a HORIZON feature encoding months from baseline. We also integrated explainability and fairness analyses. Same-visit classification achieved sensitivity of 0.951 (95% confidence interval 0.947-0.954), specificity of 0.810 (0.805-0.814), a geometric mean (G-mean) of 0.877 (0.874-0.880) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.959 (0.957-0.960). Across future horizons from 24 to 120 months, sensitivity/specificity ranged between 0.808/0.856 at 24 months and 0.833/0.706 at 120 months, while AUCs were 0.906 and 0.851. Compared with a Cox proportional hazards model, our flexible-horizon ML model achieved a higher G-mean at four of the five evaluated horizons and higher specificity from 48 months onwards, whereas Cox achieved greater sensitivity from 48 months onwards. Shapley additive explanations highlighted functional independence, prediction horizon and cognitive measures as influential. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed broadly similar balanced discrimination across sex, race and age groups, although sensitivity-specificity trade-offs varied. An interactive web application was also developed for demonstration and clinical feedback. These findings support the feasibility of flexible-horizon, clinically-informed and responsible ML-based decision support for dementia early detection; however, external validation, recalibration and prospective clinical evaluation are required before deployment.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDementiaMachine LearningSecondary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityUnited KingdomDementiaMachine learningNational Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACC UDS)Responsible AISurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID42742759
PMCPMC13578025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.