ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
A Flexible-Horizon Clinical Decision Support Model for Dementia Early Detection and Risk Prediction in Secondary Care: A Responsible AI Approach.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing machine learning (ML) models for dementia detection typically use fixed prediction windows and often lack clinically informed variable selection and responsible AI principles, thereby limiting performance, generalisability and clinical trust. We aimed to develop a single clinically informed model capable of both diagnosing dementia and predicting its onset over flexible time horizons up to 10 years. We trained our ML model on the NACC Uniform Data Set using 20 inputs compatible with UK National Healthcare Service secondary-care workflows, including a HORIZON feature encoding months from baseline. We also integrated explainability and fairness analyses. Same-visit classification achieved sensitivity of 0.951 (95% confidence interval 0.947-0.954), specificity of 0.810 (0.805-0.814), a geometric mean (G-mean) of 0.877 (0.874-0.880) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.959 (0.957-0.960). Across future horizons from 24 to 120 months, sensitivity/specificity ranged between 0.808/0.856 at 24 months and 0.833/0.706 at 120 months, while AUCs were 0.906 and 0.851. Compared with a Cox proportional hazards model, our flexible-horizon ML model achieved a higher G-mean at four of the five evaluated horizons and higher specificity from 48 months onwards, whereas Cox achieved greater sensitivity from 48 months onwards. Shapley additive explanations highlighted functional independence, prediction horizon and cognitive measures as influential. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed broadly similar balanced discrimination across sex, race and age groups, although sensitivity-specificity trade-offs varied. An interactive web application was also developed for demonstration and clinical feedback. These findings support the feasibility of flexible-horizon, clinically-informed and responsible ML-based decision support for dementia early detection; however, external validation, recalibration and prospective clinical evaluation are required before deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.