ArticlePsychological research2026
Interference control of emotional information: effect of relevance and valence.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial emotions are regarded as 2010being automatically processed to the detriment of performance. While the existence of the emotional interference effect appears to support this view, previous studies have shown that this effect can be modulated by task demands. The aim of this study was to clarify the question of the automaticity of emotional information processing using an emotional Flanker task while manipulating task instructions to make the emotion either task-relevant or task-irrelevant. A total of 57 healthy volunteers performed the task following two different instructions: an emotion-discrimination task and a gender-discrimination task. Four performance metrics were used to compute the emotional interference effect (correct reaction times, accuracy, inverse efficiency score, rate correct score). Results showed that the emotional congruency effect was only observed in accuracy and inverse efficiency scores. However, the emotional interference effect did not interact with task demands, regardless of the performance metrics. Additional Bayesian analyses yielded inconclusive evidence for this interaction. Our findings provide tentative support for the idea that emotional information may be automatically processed even if it is task-irrelevant. Moreover, our study raises a methodological consideration regarding the choice of performance metrics, which could be one of the reasons for the divergent results of emotional interference studies found in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.