ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Comparison of long-term outcomes and nutritional status between primary and non-primary fascial closure in omphalocele.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOperative strategies for omphalocele vary, and long-term outcomes remain limited. We aimed to compare postoperative and long-term outcomes of omphalocele repair with primary versus non-primary fascial closure.
methodsA retrospective study of omphalocele at 2 institutions between 2006 and 2021 was conducted. After excluding patients with genetic disorders and severe associated anomalies, 41 patients (15 primary fascial and 26 non-primary fascial closures) were reviewed.
resultsAlthough there were no significant differences in defect size or liver herniation, non-primary fascial closure was significantly associated with a concomitant non-cyanotic cardiac anomaly. Time to first enteral feeding and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in non-primary fascial closure. For long-term outcomes, non-primary fascial closure was associated with significantly higher rates of failure to thrive during infancy (76% vs. 40%) and toddlerhood (62.5% vs. 23.1%). However, there were no significant differences in ventral hernia, respiratory, or neurodevelopmental problems.
conclusionNon-primary fascial closure is associated with higher rates of failure to thrive, underscoring need for long-term follow-up of nutritional status; however, the higher incidence of cardiac anomalies in this group may reflect a bias toward selecting this closure technique. When feasible and not complicated, primary fascial closure might be preferred option for omphalocele.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742750What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.