ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Spitz: a YOLO-based deep learning system for automated spermatozoa detection in forensic genetic analysis.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In sexual assault investigations, microscopic spermatozoa identification is a critical yet subjective step in the forensic genetic workflow. Manual examination is time-consuming, prone to inter-examiner variability, and susceptible to false negatives. This study presents Spitz, a deep learning-based system for automated sperm cell detection in forensic microscopy samples and evaluates its performance against manual examination through blind comparative study. A YOLOv10-L model was trained on 399 microscopic image patches from real-world forensic cases stained with Christmas Tree stain. The model was integrated into a web interface enabling batch inference, spatial slide reconstruction, and coordinate-based expert verification. A blind comparative study was conducted with three forensic experts re-examining 30 sexual assault samples using both manual and AI-assisted methods, recording spermatozoa counts, classification (Not present, Rare, Occasional), and examination time. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Fleiss' Kappa, and coefficient of variation (CV). The model achieved 94% precision, 72.3% recall, and mAP50 of 0.842. AI-assisted detection found significantly more spermatozoa than manual examination, with lower count variability. Inter-rater agreement improved (Fleiss' Kappa: 0.858 vs. 0.698; agreement: 86.7% vs. 73.3%), with reduced classification variability across categories (mean CV: 80.1% vs. 93.5%). Examination time was shorter with AI (6.39 ± 0.59 min vs. 6.93 ± 0.70 min), though not statistically significant (p = 0.2621). Spitz significantly surpasses manual examination in detection sensitivity and inter-examiner reproducibility while reducing examiner light exposure. By integrating detection, coordinating tracking, and microscope navigation, it bridges automated analysis and downstream forensic genetic workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742721What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.