Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42742703›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2026

Derivation of guidance values under the EU Drinking Water Directive : the case study of trifluoroacetic acid.

Robin Sur, Richard Bartlett, Bastian Becker, Anja Hueser, Felix M Kluxen, Volker Laabs, Jyotigna Mehta, Stephanie Melching-Kollmuss, Ursula G Sauer, Emily Scorgie and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robin SurBayer AG, Crop Science, Alfred-Nobel-Strasse 50, 40789, Monheim, Germany. robin.sur@bayer.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3403-8168
Richard BartlettJealott's Hill International Research Centre, Syngenta, Jealott's Hill, UK.
Bastian BeckerBayer AG, Crop Science, Alfred-Nobel-Strasse 50, 40789, Monheim, Germany.
Anja HueserBayer AG, Crop Science, Alfred-Nobel-Strasse 50, 40789, Monheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9312-2703
Felix M KluxenBASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-5477
Volker LaabsBASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6344-6595
Jyotigna MehtaADAMA Agricultural Solutions Ltd, Reading, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-0158
Stephanie Melching-KollmussBASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3358-6164
Ursula G SauerScientific Consultancy - Animal Welfare, Neubiberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-2985
Emily ScorgieSyngenta, Enkhuizen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6869-3281
Derek F WallaceISK Biosciences Europe NV, Diegem, Belgium.

Funding

CropLife Europe Administrative supportCropLife Europe article publishing chargesCropLife Europe the fees for writing assistance were provided by CropLife Europe.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is a metabolite of e.g., pesticides, refrigerants and propellants, and it is considered a 'non-relevant metabolite' of pesticides under the EU Drinking Water Directive (DWD) as current exposures have not been found to provide a consumer health risk. Since an EU-harmonised concept for the derivation of drinking water guidance values is unavailable, various guidance values have been proposed or implemented on the Member State level for TFA in drinking water. This causes uncertainty with respect to the adequacy of such values. To address this uncertainty, the scientific rationale underlying the different guidance values is reviewed here. It is further shown that TFA should not be included in the DWD definitions for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; this is relevant for one of the suggested guidance values. Finally, a science-based approach for deriving guidance values for substances in drinking water is proposed. Application of this approach to TFA as an example yields a health-based guidance value of 294 µg/L TFA in drinking water. To foster harmonisation and acceptance across agencies, this guidance value should be complemented with appropriate risk management measures (such as introduction of an upper limit for hygienic reasons); however, such further considerations are outside the scope of the present article. All stakeholders are encouraged to align on an EU-harmonised approach to derive scientifically justified and robust guidance values for substances in drinking water to adequately protect consumers.

Indexed as

Developmental toxicityExposure assessmentLiver effectsPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)Plant protection productRelevant metabolite

Identifiers

PMID42742703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.