ReviewArchives of toxicology2026
Derivation of guidance values under the EU Drinking Water Directive : the case study of trifluoroacetic acid.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is a metabolite of e.g., pesticides, refrigerants and propellants, and it is considered a 'non-relevant metabolite' of pesticides under the EU Drinking Water Directive (DWD) as current exposures have not been found to provide a consumer health risk. Since an EU-harmonised concept for the derivation of drinking water guidance values is unavailable, various guidance values have been proposed or implemented on the Member State level for TFA in drinking water. This causes uncertainty with respect to the adequacy of such values. To address this uncertainty, the scientific rationale underlying the different guidance values is reviewed here. It is further shown that TFA should not be included in the DWD definitions for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; this is relevant for one of the suggested guidance values. Finally, a science-based approach for deriving guidance values for substances in drinking water is proposed. Application of this approach to TFA as an example yields a health-based guidance value of 294 µg/L TFA in drinking water. To foster harmonisation and acceptance across agencies, this guidance value should be complemented with appropriate risk management measures (such as introduction of an upper limit for hygienic reasons); however, such further considerations are outside the scope of the present article. All stakeholders are encouraged to align on an EU-harmonised approach to derive scientifically justified and robust guidance values for substances in drinking water to adequately protect consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.