ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Physiological rather than pathological cardiac remodeling in olympic-style elite weightlifters: an imaging and biomarker study.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-intensity resistance training causes intermittent extreme afterload, but its potential to induce maladaptive myocardial fibrosis remains unclear. This study investigated the molecular and tissue-level cardiac consequences of long-term resistance training. A cross-sectional study of 13 elite male weightlifters (≥ 5 years experience) and 13 age-matched healthy controls. Participants underwent transthoracic echocardiography (longitudinal strain) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (native T1, extracellular volume [ECV], and late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]). Serum biomarkers (galectin-3, soluble ST2, TNF-α, endothelin-1, TGF-β, and cardiac troponin) were measured at rest and, for athletes, immediately post-training. Weightlifters showed higher native T1 values than controls (1003.39 vs. 974.06 ms, p<0.05), but ECV was identical (25%) and LGE prevalence was equal (15.40%), indicating no structural fibrosis. Global strain was slightly lower in athletes but remained within physiological limits. At rest, biomarkers did not differ between groups. Post-exercise, galectin-3 increased significantly (2.04 ± 0.80 to 3.01 ± 0.92 ng/mL, p=0.001), while TGF-β decreased (3.08 ± 0.41 to 2.84 ± 0.37 ng/mL, p=0.046). No significant changes occurred in other biomarkers or troponin. Despite repeated peak pressure loads, elite weightlifters exhibited physiological rather than maladaptive remodeling. The absence of structural fibrosis (normal ECV/LGE) suggests that long-term resistance training remains within an adaptive range. The post-exercise galectin-3 spike likely reflects transient extracellular matrix turnover rather than sustained profibrotic signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.