ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Panniculitis : Patterns and clues].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory infiltrates of the subcutis are a particular challenge in routine histopathology as they occur relatively rarely in submitted specimens and often only superficial portions of adipose tissue are captured in biopsies. On the other hand, panniculitides are very heterogeneous in etiology. They can arise as a reaction to physical stimuli, in metabolic disorders, as a drug reaction, in autoimmune diseases or due to pathogens. The correct classification of infiltrate patterns of adipose tissue and knowledge of associated features and diagnostic clues are essential for narrowing down the differential diagnosis. This is illustrated using more common panniculitides (lupus profundus, erythema nodosum, lipodermatosclerosis). In addition, rarer adipose tissue diseases (alpha‑1 antitrypsin deficiency, pancreatic panniculitis, morphea profunda, eosinophilic fasciitis) and vasculitides that should be considered in the differential diagnosis are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.