ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2026
Latent learning improves foraging efficiency in ants.
Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning allows animals to react to changing environmental conditions and to respond to stimuli in an adaptive way, for instance by giving novel stimuli positive or negative value. However, there is a form of learning that does not require reward or punishment: latent learning. This knowledge is hidden at the time of learning but it manifests later when a suitable incentive appears. Latent learning helps animals to navigate their environments, thus improving foraging efficiency, especially when resources are unpredictably distributed. Although latent learning has been well documented in vertebrates, including humans, it remains relatively understudied in invertebrates. We investigated whether ants use latent learning during foraging in the species Aphaenogaster senilis, living in open and sunny environments. We compared the efficiency of two groups of ants navigating a maze to get food. One group of ants was previously exposed to an empty maze (experienced), while the other group was not (control). The ants with previous experience of the empty maze found the food faster than the control group when the food was present, consistent with a positive effect of latent learning on foraging efficiency. Moreover, experienced ants returned to the nest more rapidly after discovering the food for the first time than control ants, indicating that information acquired during unrewarded explorations subsequently facilitated goal-directed behaviour. We then characterized for exploratory activity individual ants that solved the maze and ants that did not, using an open-field test. We found that maze-solvers were less exploratory than non-solvers, suggesting a potential speed-accuracy trade-off. Taken together, our results show the use of latent learning during individual foraging in ants and highlight the role of inter-individual variability in foraging strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.