ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Game engine-driven high-precision collision simulation system for radiation therapy: development and clinical evaluation.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-treatment verification is essential to prevent physical collisions between the gantry and the patient during radiation therapy. Conventionally, physical "dry runs" have been performed to ensure safety; however, these procedures can create bottlenecks in clinical workflows. This study aimed to develop virtual collision simulation software using a freely available development environment and to evaluate its performance through phantom studies and verification of clinical treatment plans. High-fidelity three-dimensional (3D) models of the linear accelerator and various immobilization devices were constructed. The software was developed in the Unity environment and incorporated a collision detection system and a function to predict treatment couch coordinates. Collision detection accuracy was assessed using phantom experiments by comparing simulated results with those obtained from the actual linear accelerator. The accuracy of couch coordinate predictions and collision detection performance were retrospectively evaluated using clinical data from 71 treatment plans. All collision prediction errors in the phantom experiments fell conservatively within a 3.00° margin prior to physical contact, and couch coordinate predictions were within 1 cm of the actual values. In the evaluation of clinical plans, the software achieved a true-positive rate of 100% and a negative predictive value of 100%. The developed software achieved high-precision collision detection despite being created in a free platform, thereby ensuring both high performance and broad reproducibility. By serving as an effective pre-screening tool and reducing the need for physical dry runs, this cost-effective and accessible solution streamlines workflow and enhances patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42742666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.