ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026
Outpatient Care Fragmentation and Patient Satisfaction With Care.
Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to examine the association between outpatient care fragmentation and self-reported patient satisfaction for Medicare beneficiaries. STUDY SETTING AND
designWe measured outpatient fragmentation, that is, how dispersed patients' care was, at the physician and practice levels with a reverse Herfindahl-Hirschman concentration index (HHI). We used three domains of satisfaction with care: access, communication, and coordination and quality. We tested the relationship between fragmentation and patient satisfaction using ordinary least squares regressions, adjusting for age, income, race/ethnicity, clinical severity, and care utilization. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We conducted a retrospective analysis using secondary data from 2020 to 2022. We used the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and Medicare claims, both collected annually by CMS. PRINCIPAL
findingsOutpatient fragmentation was common in our sample (n = 2294), with an average reverse HHI of 0.39 at the provider level and 0.22 at the practice level. Rural beneficiaries experienced more fragmentation at the practice level than their urban (reverse HHI 0.37 vs. 0.19, p < 0.001) or suburban (0.37 vs. 0.28, p < 0.001) counterparts. Provider-level fragmentation, although higher (reverse HHI 0.44 rural vs. 0.39 suburban vs. 0.39 urban), was not statistically different between populations. Non-urban beneficiaries reported lower satisfaction with accessibility (9.82 suburban vs. 10.05 urban and 9.65 rural vs. 10.05 urban, p-values 0.004 and 0.003) and coordination and quality (13.33 suburban vs. 13.64 urban and 13.37 rural vs. 13.64 urban, p-values 0.002 and 0.115). Communication scores were similar between populations. Our regression models did not establish a statistically significant relationship between outpatient fragmentation and any of our satisfaction with care scales.
conclusionsRurality was strongly linked to greater care fragmentation, while fragmentation was not linked to differences in patient satisfaction. Health systems should note that reduced fragmentation may improve health outcomes, but these may not immediately translate to improved patient experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.