Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42742461›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026

Estimation of Covariate Balancing Propensity Score Based on Outcome Adaptive Lasso.

Yi Zhou, Lizhi Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yi ZhouSchool of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Lizhi TangSchool of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China 23&ZD083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In observational studies, propensity score estimation is crucial for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE). However, covariate imbalance can introduce estimation bias, and including unnecessary covariates can also negatively affect the bias and statistical efficiency of propensity score estimation. To address this issue, this paper proposes an OALIPS estimation method for covariate balancing with causal variable selection. Through a two-step framework of screening followed by estimation, the method first precisely identifies core covariates using a comprehensive propensity score objective function with an outcome-adaptive penalty term. Subsequently, propensity score estimation is performed in a reduced-dimensional space based on a covariate balancing approach, effectively avoiding the shrinkage bias problem in traditional regularized estimation. We prove the consistency of the method's variable selection, the asymptotic normality of the parameter estimates, and the consistency of the ATE estimator based on these estimates. Simulation studies show that the proposed method outperforms conventional methods, accurately identifies confounders and predictors, and remains robust under conditions of covariate imbalance and model misspecification. Subsequently, we applied this method to right heart catheterization (RHC) data, verifying its applicability in handling complex clinical data. The results indicate that, after effectively correcting for severe baseline bias, RHC significantly increases the length of hospital stay for surviving patients.

Indexed as

BiometryPropensity ScoreCardiac CatheterizationHumansTreatment Outcomeaverage treatment effectcausal variable selectioncovariate balancingpropensity score

Identifiers

PMID42742461
PMCPMC13576797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.