ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Patient Journey Mapping in Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient journey mapping is a visualisation tool increasingly adopted in healthcare to optimise care processes. This scoping review mapped international evidence on its application to mental disorders. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines, this review searched seven databases from inception to 1 December 2025. Two reviewers independently screened records, assessed full texts and extracted data, with disagreements resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. Thematic synthesis was conducted collectively by the research team. Ten studies were included. Most included studies used qualitative or mixed-methods designs, drawing on interviews, focus groups, diaries, record reviews and questionnaires. Visualisation formats included journey maps, workflow maps and recovery pyramids. Common stages from symptom recognition to recovery emerged across studies, with four touchpoint categories and four pain point dimensions identified. Patient journey mapping demonstrates significant potential for connecting clinical practice, service management, policy and technology in mental health. However, the evidence base remains nascent, characterised by heterogeneous methods and a concentration of studies in high-income countries. Future research should prioritise methodological standardisation, expanded population coverage and integration with digital technologies to advance patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.