ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026
A Frequentist Approach Using Weighted Estimating Equations for Survival Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial With External Control Arm.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials using a hybrid control, which integrates a randomized control with external control data, may be one solution to facilitate clinical development where traditional randomized controlled trials are challenging. Despite its attractive features, systematic differences between controls can introduce bias in treatment effect estimation and inflate Type I error. Although propensity score methods may be used to address systematic differences from measured covariate imbalance, potential differences from unmeasured or unknown factors may still arise despite careful consideration. In such cases, dynamic borrowing methods have been proposed to account for potential differences between randomized and external control data and discount the contribution of external control data when needed. Conventional methods, however, often rely on Bayesian approaches, requiring proper specification of the likelihood. This is particularly challenging for survival analysis using proportional hazards model due to specification of the baseline hazard function. To address these challenges, we propose to utilize the weighted partial likelihood score equation where external control patients are weighted by the inverse probability of the propensity score and an additional discounting weight, adjusting the contribution of external control data according to its similarity to randomized control data. A new variance estimator based on stacked estimating equations is proposed to incorporate the uncertainty in estimating discounting weights. Operating characteristics of the proposed method are studied via extensive simulation. The proposed method yields reduced bias in treatment effect estimation and Type I error while improving statistical power in either scenarios where measured or unmeasured confounders exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.