ArticleNature medicine2026
Post-exposure prophylaxis with a monoclonal antibody cocktail after Bundibugyo ebolavirus exposure in adults and children.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Five individuals from a single family cluster-one rVSV-ZEBOV-vaccinated adult and four unvaccinated children aged 1-7 years-received investigational MBP134 as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) 5-6 days after high- to intermediate-risk occupational or household exposure to Bundibugyo ebolavirus (BDBV). MBP134 is a broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody cocktail that has conferred protection against BDBV in non-human primates but, to our knowledge, has not previously been evaluated as PEP in humans. Given the absence of approved preventive interventions against BDBV and the substantial case-fatality rate of Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD), MBP134 was administered as an individual treatment attempt under emergency Investigational New Drug (eIND) authorizations. Administration was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. Throughout the 21-day monitoring period, all family members remained free of clinical or laboratory evidence of BVD, as assessed by daily medical evaluation and serial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Plasma Orthoebolavirus-reactive antibodies were detected after infusion, persisted throughout follow-up and mediated broad neutralizing activity against multiple Orthoebolavirus species, including authentic BDBV. Notably, endogenous BDBV-reactive IgM and IgA were detected in the adult after high-risk exposure despite persistently negative PCR results. Together, these findings support prospective evaluation of MBP134 as PEP for high-risk adult and pediatric contacts during BDBV outbreaks.
Identifiers
42742181What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.