ArticleClinical transplantation2026
Impact of Preoperative Cardiac Screening Modality on Cardiovascular Outcomes After Liver Transplantation.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Preoperative Cardiac Screening Modality on Cardiovascular Outcomes After Liver Transplantation.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular (CV) disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has increasingly replaced stress testing (ST) for CV risk assessment in LT candidates with intermediate-to-high CV risk, although comparative evidence remains limited. The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-LT major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by CV screening modality; the secondary endpoint was to identify predictors of MACE.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 506 patients who underwent LT between 2018 and 2023. According to CV screening modality, patients were stratified into three groups: no test (low CV risk), ST, or CCTA.
resultsAmong 506 LT recipients, 358 (70.8%) presented low CV risk, 57 (11.3%) underwent ST, and 91 (18.0%) CCTA. Compared with ST, CCTA led to higher rates of coronary angiography (14% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.011) and revascularization (0% vs. 15.4%, p < 0.0001). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years [IQR 1.5-3.9], MACE occurred more frequently in CCTA (18.4%) and ST (14%) groups than in low-risk group (9%) (p = 0.041), while no significant difference was observed between CCTA and ST groups (14% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.501). In univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis, only age and family history of coronary artery disease were independent predictors of MACE.
conclusionsCCTA and ST resulted in comparable post-LT CV outcomes. Although CCTA was associated with a higher number of pre-LT coronary interventions, it was not associated with a lower incidence of MACE, underscoring the need to refine CV risk stratification protocols in LT candidates. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Currently, there are no international guidelines for cardiovascular screening procedures in LT candidates, leading to variability in practice across different centers and countries. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a more accurate method than stress testing (ST) in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with end-stage liver disease. In the present study, all pre-transplant coronary revascularizations were performed in patients screened with CCTA, while none occurred in the ST group. Despite this, the incidence of post-LT major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar between groups. In our cohort, revascularizations prompted by CCTA did not significantly reduce post-LT MACE rate. Age and family history of CAD were the only independent predictors of MACE. Our results underscore the need to refine cardiovascular risk stratification protocols for LT candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.