ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
North American Genetic Counselors' Perceptions of Identifiability From Demographic Questions on Surveys.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Demographic data are routinely collected in surveys to assess participant diversity, analyze subgroup trends, and promote ethical, representative research. However, in small professional fields like genetic counseling, the combination of multiple demographic variables can raise concerns about identifiability. This study aimed to examine whether the design of demographic questions affects the willingness of genetic counselors (GCs) in the United States and Canada to participate in surveys and to respond accurately, particularly those who identify as part of an underrepresented minority (URM) group. A total of 153 GCs completed a 13-item online survey between August and September 2023. The survey included questions assessing whether participants identified as part of an URM within the profession, their level of participation in research and professional surveys, and concerns with demographic questions and the potential to be identified. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel, and qualitative free-text responses were examined using inductive thematic analysis to identify common concerns and recommendations. Respondents who identified as part of an URM were more likely to feel that they could be identified based on their responses to demographic responses compared to their non-URM peers. Although all participants reported active participation in research and professional surveys, several indicated they skipped certain demographic questions or modified their responses to increase anonymity. In open-ended responses, participants emphasized the importance of limiting unnecessary demographic questions and using flexible formats to minimize identifiability. Our study highlights the need for greater reflection on the design of demographic questions as they can affect how willing GCs are to take part in surveys, especially those from URM backgrounds, and overall data quality and representation. We encourage researchers to be transparent about why demographic information is collected, offer flexible and inclusive response options, and assess ways to protect anonymity as it may help build trust and encourage fuller participation in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.